Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
European Radiology  ·  2026

An Artificial Intelligence Framework for Universal Landmark Matching and Morphometry in Musculoskeletal Radiography

Dennis Eschweiler1,2,* Eneko Cornejo Merodio1,2 Felix Barajas Ordonez2 Aleksandar Lichev1,2 Nikol Ignatova1,2 Marc Sebastian von der Stück2 Christiane Kuhl2 Daniel Truhn1,2 Sven Nebelung1,2,*

1Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany 2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany *deschweiler@ukaachen.de, snebelung@ukaachen.de
Referencea point is moved by hand Targetthe matched point follows in real time
Once the dense correspondence between a reference and a target radiograph is established, landmark matching runs in real time. A set of landmarks defined once on the reference can be mapped onto every radiograph of a cohort, and the measurements built on them follow automatically.

Abstract

This study presents a zero-shot artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach for automated landmark matching in radiographs, designed to improve scalability and reliability in deriving musculoskeletal (MSK) measurements across various anatomic regions and conditions. Key anatomic landmarks were manually identified under expert supervision, building the basis to automatically derive pertinent angle and distance measurements. Using one patient's radiograph as a reference, a robust AI-based feature matching approach establishes dense matches between the reference and unseen target images. Reference landmarks are transferred along the dense matching, resulting in precise landmark placement and automated calculation of MSK measurements within an entire patient cohort. The results demonstrate versatile and robust application without requiring anatomy-specific training, while radiographs with orthopedic implants remain challenging for some measurements.

A skeleton with the measurements of the study at the shoulder, the knee and the foot.

A single AI framework for universal application

From head to toe

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown great potential in assisting radiologists with musculoskeletal (MSK) assessments across various anatomical regions1,2,3,4. However, most existing tools are narrowly tailored for specific anatomies or rely on segmentation-based methods as a basis. To address these limitations, we propose a versatile and generalist AI-based approach for landmark matching. In contrast to typical generalist landmark matching approaches that depend on automatically identified, optimally descriptive landmarks5,6,7, our use-case has to be based on manually selected landmarks tailored for MSK measurements.

As these landmarks are potentially suboptimal for precise matching, we employ an AI-based method8 that first performs multi-scale dense image matching between the reference and target images independently of the landmarks. Landmark positions are then transferred to the target image along these correspondences. The approach is anatomy-agnostic, so the same backbone model serves a wide range of anatomical regions and MSK measurements. For more detailed information we refer to our paper.

  • ShoulderAP
  • KneeAP
  • Kneelateral
  • Kneeaxial
  • FootAP
  • Footlateral

How it works

Schematic of the method on a lateral knee. Landmarks are placed once on a reference radiograph. A shared encoder reads the reference and a target radiograph, and every position of the reference is matched to the target. The landmarks follow these matches to the target, where the Insall-Salvati ratio is drawn from them. The same happens for every further radiograph of the cohort. Referenceannotated once Target 1not annotated Shared encoder multi-scale features

Swipe to see the whole figure.

  1. 1Annotate once

    An expert places the landmarks of the measurements on a single reference radiograph. The rest of the cohort stays unannotated.

  2. 2Match densely

    One shared encoder of transformers and convolutional layers reads both radiographs at multiple scales, and every position of the reference is matched to the target, independently of the landmarks.

  3. 3Transfer and measure

    The landmarks follow the dense matches to every target, where the redundancy of the matching stabilizes their final position. The measurements follow automatically.

Schematic, drawn from the lateral-knee measurement definitions of the paper. The landmarks and the Insall-Salvati ratio stand in for every view and measurement.

Inference service Self-hosted

The pipeline also runs as a Docker service on your own GPU machine, with a REST endpoint and an MCP server for AI agents. The Radiograph Morphometry Agent takes all of its measurements from it.

Visualizing the inner workings

Behind the curtain

The process of establishing a dense match between two images relies on abstract feature representations for each position in both the reference and target images. To better understand which information is encoded by the AI, we examined the feature similarities between a specific position within the reference image and the entire target image. Our findings show that the AI captures both semantic and texture features. The matching process utilizes this encoded information, along with precise positional data, to create a reliable mapping between the images.

Left, a shoulder radiograph with one position marked in red. Right, a second shoulder radiograph overlaid with the similarity of every position to the marked one.
Referencethe queried position Targetfeature similarity to it, bright is similar

Annotation through imitation

From novice to expert

Our findings indicate that the selection of the reference radiograph significantly influences the outcome, as each radiograph is unique and often presents highly superimposed structures. This can introduce ambiguity regarding the precise position and the intended anatomical structure to be marked by the landmark. To enhance the reliability of the matching process, multiple reference radiographs can be used to establish a more robust alignment based on overall agreement. Increasing the number of reference radiographs systematically improves the framework's ability to account for variations between radiographs, leading to a steady improvement in matching accuracy as demonstrated by the results below.

Sixteen bar charts, one per measurement, for 1, 5, 10, 20 and 40 reference radiographs, each with the inter-rater score as a red dashed line.

Swipe to see the whole figure.

Accompanying & downstream projects

Built on this framework

DGMSR Science Award 2026 41,000+ radiographs

AI challenges the reference standards for lateral knee morphometry

Many clinical reference values were fixed decades ago from small patient groups and never tested at scale. Using automated AI landmark measurement on more than 41,000 lateral knee radiographs from two independent health systems, we show that the most widely used patellar height threshold systematically misclassifies knees without reported imaging finding, demonstrating how automated morphometry can re-evaluate inherited diagnostic standards.

Paper · tba
11,000+ paired radiographs

On the symmetry of the contralateral knee

The contralateral knee is widely used as a reference in patellofemoral radiography, but how much side-to-side difference a routine radiograph can actually resolve has never been quantified. Using automated AI landmark measurement on more than 11,000 paired knee radiographs from a multi-site health system, we show that side-to-side differences in patellofemoral indices fall at the resolution floor of radiography itself, defining index-specific tolerance intervals within which the contralateral knee is a usable reference and beyond which it is not.

Paper · tba
Paper in preparation

A morphometry agent for clinical routine

Bringing automated morphometry into everyday reporting, an LLM agent works a radiograph case step by step and drafts the structured report, taking every measurement from the validated morphometry service and every reference range from a guideline corpus instead of its own priors, while the radiologist stays in the loop to correct landmarks, wording and thresholds.

Coming soon

Assessing pediatric hip morphometry

Paper · tba
Coming soon

Automated quality control of hip radiographs

Paper · tba

Citation

@article{eschweiler2026RadiographMatching,
  title={An Artificial Intelligence Framework for Universal Landmark Matching and Morphometry in Musculoskeletal Radiography},
  author={Dennis Eschweiler and Eneko Cornejo Merodio and Felix Barajas Ordonez and Aleksandar Lichev and Nikol Ignatova and Marc Sebastian von der St{\"u}ck and Christiane K. Kuhl and Daniel Truhn and Sven Nebelung},
  journal={European Radiology},
  pages={1--14},
  year={2026},
  doi={10.1007/s00330-026-12555-y}
}

The dense matching builds on RoMa by Edstedt et al. (CVPR 2024). If you use the framework, please consider citing it as well.